To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
It’s interesting to me that she’s been asking for safety regulations since 2016. Section 230 of the 1996 Communications decency act gave impunity to big tech – what a mistake.
“the death of democracy is a byproduct of letting Tech remain the most unregulated industry globally” 37:54
This is where the problem lies. And we know that it will not get regulated any time soon.
That’s a great interview. Thanks for sharing.
I agree, this sheds even more light on the situation than is presented in her book. I don’t agree with her about the intent behind Big Tech, at least as a whole. I think there are several bad actors who are motivated by more than just money and opportunity, as she says. EM for one and MZ for another. In these two, they have shown repeatedly their disdain for the “Parasite Class” or the “dumb f***s” who use their platform.
There is a new book out with some insight on this – I hope to get a copy soon to review for myself. But I think that once we have a better picture of this, there might be more incentive to review our online choices. At least, I hope there will be.
It is telling that she’s begging Jon to make it funny so that people will listen to her warnings. I took a look at her Matrix platform and it looks robust, but to be honest, I didn’t really understand it very well. It will take some time to figure it out.
I do love her idea of a public tech stack though. Tara and I were chatting about this just last week too. We have the CBC to ensure that there is a media channel that serves the citizens, so it does make sense to have a publicly-funded tech platform with the same mandate. Many people are looking for safe and more ethical alternatives.